WARTO PRZECZYTAĆ
1. JAK PODNIEŚĆ WARTOŚĆ WNIOSKU PROJEKTOWEGO
2. WYSYŁANIE WNIOSKU PROJEKTOWEGO
3. OCENA WNIOSKU
Analizując dokumenty Unii dotyczące 5PR, można bez trudu dopatrzyć się dwóch bardzo ważnych elementów, które zdecydowanie mogą podniość wartość projektu RTD
Są to jak zwykle kobiety i SME-sy.
Małe i Średnie Przedsiębiorstwa, tzw. SME-sy, zachęcane są do uczestnictwa w 5PR nie tylko przez konkursy Progamu Ramowego Growth ( 2 Program Horyzotalny przeznaczony jest głównie dla MŚP). W zadaniach programu Growth SME-sy mogą wystąpić między innymi jako użytkownicy wyników z projektów badawczych. Zespoły badawcze ze SME-sami uzyskują dodatkowe uznanie w Komisji Europejskiej ze względu politykę prowadzoną przez Unię dotyczącą Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorstw.
Jeśli chodzi o płeć piękną to Komisja Europejska wyjątkowo zachęca kobiety do uczestnictwa we wszystkich projektach przewidzianych w 5PR a także we wszystkich rodzajach stypendiów (stypendia dla młodych pracowników naukowych z krajów rozwijających się, stypednia Marie Curie). Jeśli chodzi o stypendia to należy nie wysyłać naszych pracowników a zapraszać do naszych pracowni, instytutów, jednostek badawczych a także do jednostek przemysłowych.
Dodatkowym elementem podnoszącym wartość projektów z 5PR jest uczestnictwo polskich naukowców. Polscy naukowcy cieszą się wysokim uznaniem i autorytetem w Europie. Będąc obecnie w zintegrowanej europejskiej strukturze badawczej będziemy mieli szanse uczestniczyć w licznych zadaniach przewidzianych w 5PR Unii Europejskiej.
Rozważając więc dokumenty Unii oraz uwzględniając ostatni akapit można powiedzieć teraz, że walory projektu podniosą polskie kobiety i SME-sy
1.2 Stypendyści z krajów rozwijających się
Składając wniosek o finansowanie projektu RTD można również złożyć dodatkowo wniosek
Osoba zaproszona na stypendium może uczestniczyć w realicji składanego projektu. Pieniądze na stypendium pochodzą z programu INCO
Szczegółowe informacje podane są w Guide for Proposers Part 1 na stronie 10 oraz w 1 Programie Horyzontalnym
Można zachęcać swoich współpracowników np. prze doktoratem o składanie wniosków bezpośrednio do Komisji
Dla absolwentów i młodych pracowników naukowych po doktoracie składanych przez instytucję zapraszającą ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wniosków stypendialnych składanych przez Małe i średnie Przedsiębiorstwa
Szerzej na temat stypendiów można dowiedzieć się z 3 Programu Horyzontalnego
2.1 Praktyczne wskazówki przed wysłaniem wniosków
Ethical issues: Clearly describe any potential ethical aspects
and applicable regulatory aspects of the research to be carried out and the way
they are dealt with according to national regulations.
Proposals
may be sent by one of the following methods:
- Made
with the Proposal Preparation Tool and submitted electronically, the details of
which are given in the Guide for Proposers. When packaging a proposal for
electronic submission, two files are created. The first is a small validation
file, which provides basic information on the proposal and a unique
identification code. The European Commission must receive this validation file before
the deadline specified in this call. The second file contains the proposal
and must be received unmodified, as verifiable from the unique identification
code, not later than 48 hours after this deadline.
- Made
with the Proposal Preparation Tool and printed out by the co-ordinator, or
prepared on the paper forms distributed with the Guide for Proposers and sent
by post, courier[1]
or hand delivery to the following address. To be receivable, proposals
submitted on paper must be received by the Commission before the applicable
deadline for receipts at the following address:
The
GROWTH Programme
Research
Proposals Office
Square
Frère-Orban/Frère-Orbanplein 8
B
– 1040 Brussels
Proposers
are requested to use only one of the methods described above by which to submit
proposals, and to submit only one version of any given proposal. In the case of
an eligible proposal being received in both paper and electronic formats, only
the electronic version will be evaluated.
2.3 Ile kopii
Paper
proposals should be prepared :
-
with five bound copies of Part A
-
with five bound copies of Part B
-
with five bound copies of Part C,
-
with one complete unbound paper with signatures.
The complete set of proposal documentation should
be placed in an envelope or envelopes, marked “Commercial-in-confidence” with additionally the following
information:
Ø
The name of the Programme to
which it is submitted, the date of publication of the Call and the Call
identifier;
Ø
A reference to the work
addressed by the proposal (e.g. the name or number of the key action, action
line etc., as given in the Work Programme or Call for Proposals).
The package should also contain a completed “Acknowledgement of receipt” form (see Annex
1)
so that the Commission can return notification of safe arrival of the proposal.
This envelope/these envelopes should then be sealed
within a second envelope or packaging, which is addressed to the Commission
office for receipt of proposals given as specified in the call
text.
3.1 Kryteria oceny
Jakikolwiek projekt oceniony ponizej ustalonego pulapu przy uwzglednieniu powyzszych kryteriow nie bedzie finansowany przez UE. Tych kryteriow nalezy rowniez przestrzegac przy realizacji zadania badawczego po to zeby osiagnac doskonalosc i spojnosc zalozen projektowych.
Powyzsze kryteria powinny byc bezwzglednie uwzglednione przy budowie konsorcjum, zeby nie powstala jakas luka (patrzac na podane kryteria) przy skladanym wniosku projektowym.
3.2 Ocena wniosków projektowych
Model of Evaluation Summary
Report
Programme:
Date:
Proposal No.:
Proposal title:
Proposal acronym (if used):
Marks achieved for evaluation criteria:
1. Scientific/technological quality and innovation ¨
Comments:
2. Community added value and contribution to EU policies ¨
Comments:
3. Contribution to Community social objectives ¨
Comments:
4. Economic development and S&T prospects ¨
Comments:
5. Resources, partnership and management ¨
Comments:
Overall ¨
General/overall comments
[including proposals for modifications and possibilities for clustering/fusion
with other proposals]:
EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR THE PROGRAMME
“COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH”
1. The Evaluation process
- Pre-Registration:
Not envisaged for paper submission, but pre-notification is obligatory in the
case of electronic submission.
- Pre-proposal
check: Pre-screening will be offered.
- Remote
or postal evaluation: All evaluations will normally be performed within the
premises controlled by the Commission.
- Anonymity:
The programme will conduct the evaluation of the scientific, technological
excellence and innovation aspects as described in part B of the RTD proposal
respecting strict anonymity. The scientific and technical part of the RTD
proposal should therefore be written in an anonymous manner. Identity of
partners might be revealed in the other part of the proposal. Anonymity is however
not requested for co-ordination activities, support to research infrastructure
or accompanying measures, although the whole evaluation will be conducted
without regard to identity of the applicants except insofar as the
characteristics of the proposer(s) are relevant to the criteria.
- The
Evaluation Procedure: The evaluation process will consider two main
parts:
-
the evaluation of the scientific, technical and managerial part
-
the evaluation of the socio-economic aspects.
The
recommendation of experts will be based on marks allocated, comments given and
programme priorities. If there is more than one group of experts, these should
agree independently on the recommendation of the proposals. In a subsequent
step, extended groups will revise the consolidated evaluation results, examine
possible doubtful cases, and discuss the ranking.
- Marking:
To be recommended, a proposal should receive more than 18.0 points out of a
total of 25. Marks will normally be averaged between evaluators to the first decimal
point.
- Ranking:
Proposals recommended will usually be ranked according to the marks, per
key action or generic activity. Final recommendation will however not be based
only on marks but also on justified comments. The relative importance of some
proposals in expressing the priorities as defined in the call may also be used
as input for the setting up of the final list.
- Procedure
for the Specific Measures for SMEs: The evaluation procedure, criteria and
weightings concerning the above will be defined in the specific annex to the
“Innovation and Participation of SMEs” programme.
2. Specific
interpretation of evaluation criteria: RTD actions and related activities have to be selected according to
criteria reflecting the overall objectives of the programme. These criteria are
grouped in five categories described in pages 13, 14 and 15 of the general part
of this manual (scientific / technological quality and innovation, Community
added value and contribution to EU policies, contribution to Community social
objectives, economic development and S&T prospects, management and
resources).
For most activities within
this programme, and referring to the five evaluation criteria, particular
attention would be given to projects which facilitate cross-sectoral exchanges
and consider multi-disciplinarity as well as participation of all relevant
stakeholders in consortia, including industrial and related service
enterprises, effective participation of SMEs wherever possible, and/or links
and access by SMEs to RTD results.
3. Weighting of the
evaluation criteria and thresholds: For this programme equal weighting will be given to the five selection
criteria.
The thresholds proposed for
shared-cost RTD activities are as follows:
|
Minimum mark (scale 0 - 5) |
KA1 |
KA2 |
KA3 |
KA4 |
Mat |
M&T |
|
S&T excellence |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
|
Community added value (1) |
3.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
Societal needs |
3.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
Economic prospects |
4.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
Partnership &
management(2) |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
(1) 4.0 in the case of dedicated
calls
(2) 4.0
in the case of large scale proposals (e.g. technology platforms) with more than
€10 million total cost and/or very large number of participants
{KA1= “innovative products,
processes and organisation”; KA2=”sustainable mobility and intermodality”;
KA3=”land transport and marine technologies”; KA4=”new perspectives for
aeronautics”; Mat=”materials and their technologies for production and
transformation” including steel research; M&T= “measurements and testing”}
For the other activities
the thresholds are as follows:
|
Minimum mark (scale 0 - 5) |
Co-ordination activities |
Support to Research Infrastructure |
Accompanying measures |
|
S&T excellence |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
Community added value |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 (3) |
|
Societal needs |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 (3) |
|
Economic prospects |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
Partnership &
management |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
(3) For policy driven
research studies in KA2 the thresholds are increased to 4.0
[1] For courier services that require a telephone number for the recipient, please use (32-2)298 42 06